African history, culture & futures — told by us
Skip to content
Economic Systems Contemporary (2000–present) Pan-African

African Eurobond yield curve — what 2024 issuance tells us

Ngozi Eze Verified · January 19, 2026 · 2 min read
<p>African sovereign Eurobond issuance recovered substantially in 2024 after the 2022–2023 drought, with Côte d&#x27;Ivoire, Benin, Kenya, and Senegal returning to international capital markets. The yield curve that the 2024 issuances established is the most informative single data point on how the international fixed-income market is pricing African sovereign risk after the Ghana, Zambia, and Ethiopia restructuring cases worked through the Common Framework.</p> <p>Côte d&#x27;Ivoire&#x27;s January 2024 dual-tranche issuance (USD 2.6 billion at 7.625% for the 8.5-year and 8.25% for the 13-year) priced reasonably tight against the comparable EM-frontier-sovereign curve; the 2025 Ethiopian-Eritrean and Benin smaller follow-on issuances confirmed the trend. Kenya&#x27;s February 2024 USD 1.5 billion 6-year at 9.75% priced wider than Côte d&#x27;Ivoire, reflecting Kenya&#x27;s higher debt-to-GDP, larger external-financing-requirement, and the perceived political-economy risk around the Ruto administration&#x27;s tax-revenue mobilization difficulties. Senegal&#x27;s June 2024 USD 750 million 7-year at 7.75% priced between the two — the Faye administration&#x27;s early credibility had not yet been tested.</p> <p>The post-2024 yield-curve structure that emerges has three observable features. First, the African sovereign Eurobond market remains open for issuers with established IMF programmes, recent debt-restructuring exit, and credible fiscal-consolidation paths — Côte d&#x27;Ivoire and Benin fit this profile. Second, the pricing differential between the strongest African issuers and the weakest priced-in issuers has widened — Kenya&#x27;s 9.75% versus Côte d&#x27;Ivoire&#x27;s 7.625% is a larger spread differential than the comparable 2018–2019 differential between the same issuer categories. Third, the maturity structure that issuers are achieving has shortened — the 30-year and 25-year tranches that were available in 2018–2019 have been substantially replaced by 10-year-and-shorter tranches.</p> <p>Carmen Reinhart&#x27;s work (when at the World Bank as Chief Economist through 2022, and her subsequent academic writing at Harvard Kennedy School) on sovereign-debt cycles, Mitu Gulati&#x27;s writing on sovereign-debt restructuring (Duke Law School), and the Lazard sovereign advisory team&#x27;s published commentary have provided the analytical infrastructure for reading the 2024 African issuance window. The shared interpretation: the Common Framework&#x27;s operational improvements through 2023–2024 (faster Ghana case, more predictable creditor-committee formation) restored some market confidence but the underlying African sovereign-risk repricing from the 2022 cycle has not fully reversed.</p> <p>The structural implication for African public finance is significant. Yield levels of 7.5–10% in dollar terms translate to substantially higher debt-service-to-revenue ratios than the 4–6% Africa was issuing at in the 2017–2019 era. The Common Framework restructurings produced nominal-haircut and tenor-extension benefits for the participating sovereigns; the still-performing African sovereigns paid for that institutional cleanup through higher coupon levels on their continued issuance. The forward question is whether the AfCFTA-supported intra-African trade growth produces current-account improvement at a pace that allows African sovereigns to deleverage their Eurobond exposure over the 2027–2032 maturity wall, or whether the next cycle&#x27;s restructuring queue forms while the current cycle&#x27;s structural-adjustment-style fiscal contractions are still working through. Both scenarios are plausible from where the 2024 yield curve sits.</p>

Sign in to send a virtual gift to the contributor.

0 likes Sign in to like

More in Economic Systems